http://bearsnecessity.disqus.com/Discussion of all things Cal.enTue, 21 Oct 2008 14:55:53 -0000http://bearsnecessity.com/cal-football/cal-arizona-report-card/#comment-3206368<p>Yeah, A C is about right. He was a B during his first two quarters, and a D- in the third quarter. 2 for 12 is bad, but I have to note that Arizona was dropping seven into coverage on most of Longshore's passing downs, AND that the running game stagnated for that entire quarter too. I blame the offensive collapse more on the playcalling in the 3rd, which put Nate in an unenviable position where he had to pass and the defense knew he had to pass.</p><p>His Arizona State 2nd half was far worse last year.</p>AvinashTue, 21 Oct 2008 14:55:53 -0000http://bearsnecessity.com/cal-football/cal-arizona-report-card/#comment-3206249<p>Longshore gets a C? A passing grade? It was a typical Longshore performance, that much is true, but a typical performance during his Big Slide with just enough first quarter excitement to get you to care followed by his inevitable meltdown. 2 for 15 for 3rd down conversions? A C?</p>BerCaleyTue, 21 Oct 2008 14:48:19 -0000