<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bears Necessity - Latest Comments in Initial Post-U$C Thoughts</title><link>http://bearsnecessity.disqus.com/</link><description>Discussion of all things Cal.</description><atom:link href="https://bearsnecessity.disqus.com/initial_post_uc_thoughts/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 06:05:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Initial Post-U$C Thoughts</title><link>http://bearsnecessity.com/random/initial-post-uc-thoughts/#comment-3642945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. Bless you for researching that preposterous scenario. We need more people who see this optimistic side.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We really shouldn't judge our quarterbacks based on their performances today. Riley and Longshore were coming in under difficult circumstances against perhaps the best defense in the country. For one to play the first half and the other to play the second could not have been easy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our bigger issues were at the line of scrimmage, and it cost us way more than Longshore or Riley's erratic throwing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Avinash</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 06:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>