-
Website
http://bearsnecessity.com -
Original page
http://bearsnecessity.com/irrelevant/tedford-tournament-of-champions-cal-2005-vs-cal-2006/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
CSears
1 comment · 2 points
-
bearsnecessity
2 comments · 1 points
-
Avinash
62 comments · 1 points
-
OskiGoDumb
1 comment · 1 points
-
Artificial
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Also our defense was definitely better in 2005 than 2006, especially with . Other than the Maurice Jones-Drew debacle, we kept Reggie Bush in check, knocked out Dennis Dixon, shut out Arizona, etc. etc. We could have gone 11-1 if Ayoob didn't throw so many picks and the running backs weren't fumbleprone.
That 2006 team was a classic bend-don't-break defense; they'd give up 20 points, but our offense would lay out 40. Against USC they finally broke, and I'd say our 2005 defense was only a few degrees worse than those '06 Trojans.
And I'll again agree that Longshore struggled mightily from the Washington game on (with the exception of a spectacular UCLA game), as did the rest of the team.
As a whole, I say "at-times" dominant, simply because I saw what the '06 squad could do when they put it all together.
You have a valid point that we dominated inferior competition, but I also saw what we were able to do against legitimate Top 25 caliber teams (when we played them) such as Texas A&M and Oregon (before their slide).
It is hard to deny that we began clicking on all cylinders after the debacle of the Tenn, when we rattled off eight straight wins.
In the end, I suppose I retract my earlier statement. I CAN see how a team who almost lost to Washington and Stanford AT home, and inexcusably lost to Arizona, could lose to an 8-4 '05 Bears Squad. You got me 'Nash.